JRD
affects kidney development by varying degrees. In a very similar way
that Hip Dysplasia (HD) affects Hip development in varying degrees,
from a hip score of 0:0 = 0 up to 53:53 = 106 and every variable
score in between, including unbalanced scores such as 03:47 = 50. I
well remember the varying opinions of GSD breeders when asked to
submit their dogs to an x-ray when the Hip Dysplasia identification
Scheme was introduced. Some breeders still reject/ignore the HD
Scheme. The Elbow Dysplasia (ED) Scheme here in the UK is very
poorly used by breeders and many stud dogs are not haemophilia
tested. So readers will now understand that many breeders are
reluctant to accept new Health Screening Tests, this reluctance must
be addressed, mainly because there will be many more DNA test for
various diseases discovered in the not to distant future, and our
breed organisations should therefore develop a policy for their
introduction, with particular emphasis on AGREED TESTING PROCEDURES,
FULL RESULTS REGISTRATION & PUBLICATION. This could be organised by
the Kennel Club and/or the GSD Breed Council.
Of
course I can understand these organisations waiting until all
patenting and scientific publication of any Health Screening Test is
completed, and thus fully authenticated. The JRD DNA Test is in the
process of becoming fully authenticated. In the meantime, breeders
have choices, either to test NOW, or to wait until the test is
authenticated and then to test. I chose to test now, others have
made similar decisions and others have decided wait. Concern about
the current absence of authentication, is no justification to
dismiss the test as false or inaccurate, it is simply justification
to wait until it is authenticated before testing.
I
believe that some GSD breeders are JRD testing some of their dogs
and when a dog is identified as a JRD CARRIER, they are keeping it
secret, and some of these breeders may also be making strenuous
efforts to undermine the validity of this JRD DNA Test to avoid
facing up to reality. Denial of factual reality is a common
occurrence amongst breeders and exhibitors, frequently identifiable
when discussing show results. Every GSD breeder and owner should
realise that when this JRD DNA Test is fully validated, which is
expected sometime during next year 2009, JRD DNA testing will
identify JRD carriers, as it is already doing. DNA tests for JRD can
and will identify, through the pedigrees of the identified carriers,
which dogs the JRD was most likely to have been inherited from. By a
process of further testing, which will happen, the parental carrier
is most likely to be identified. Breeders who do not JRD DNA test
will not be able to avoid the eventual identification of any dogs
that are JRD carriers. Many puppy owners will have them JRD tested
and identified JRD carriers will lead to questions about their
parents and their pedigree.
I
remember a similar situation in respect of a breeder/owner of two
GSD brothers who were at stud, without them being Haemophilia
tested. Several offspring from these two dogs were haemophilia
tested by their owners and identified with Haemophilia, which
clearly indicated their sires had Haemophilia, which proved to be
the case. This also highlighted the importance of haemophilia
testing stud dogs. Every stud dog owner should have them Haemophilia
tested.
I
also believe that it is possible for a register of JRD tested GSD to
be organised by the Kennel Club or Breed Council, and be included on
KC registration certificates.
"I
HAVE A DREAM" that one day ALL health screening tests will be
compulsory for ALL dogs before they are used for breeding, and
details will be included on all Kennel Club Registration
Certificates. My dream is certainly a nightmare for all unscrupulous
GSD breeders. I am very pleased the GSD “partnership” is united in
their determination to push and push very hard to make compulsory
Health Screening tests a reality. This “partnership” offers hope for
our breed, I give them my fullest support.
Remembering that JRD affects kidneys by varying degrees, some dogs
may be slightly affected with between 1% to 5% loss of kidney
function and these will live normal lives. Others may be affected
with up to 50% loss of kidney function and most if not all of these
dogs will live normal lives. It is not until JRD has caused more
than 50% loss of kidney function that the signs of kidney problems
may become apparent. When kidney function is around 70% less than
normal the toxins build up in the dogs blood leading to fatal uremic
poisoning. I ask the question: What frequencies of GSD fatalities
from JRD are required for GSD breeders to take this disease
seriously? Every single owner of a GSD that dies from JRD will
answer this question very easily, EVEN ONE DEATH FROM JRD IS ONE TOO
MANY!
These
facts clearly indicate the difficulty of convincing breeders to test
for JRD, because fatalities through JRD are thankfully and
mercifully rare in GSD here in the UK, and also the only definitive
'clinical test' for JRD is a kidney biopsy, which few if any GSD
breeders/owners would put their apparently healthy dogs through.
However if breeders continue to breed without knowledge of the JRD
status of the parents, and a JRD CARRIER, or worse still a JRD
HOMOZYGOTE CARRIER is involved, and/or a very popular stud dog
happens to be one of these JRD CARRIERS, then JRD will escalate in
the GSD breed with consequential higher incidence of fatalities.
Breeders may be able to cover up infrequent fatalities however if
JRD escalates fatalities will become much more difficult to cover
up. By then of course JRD will have become much more widespread in
GSD and much more difficult to control or eradicate in our breed.
The
JRD DNA test was discovered by Doctor Mary Whiteley (Biologist) and
is currently going through normal patenting processes, following
which scientific publication takes place. It is anticipated this
will be completed by July 2009. In the meantime the JRD DNA Test has
been made available by Doctor Mary Whiteley through her own company
DOGenes Inc.
of Canada. The test will not be available elsewhere until the full
scientific authentication process has been completed. It is
understandable that until this patenting and scientific publishing
has been completed, many people, scientific, veterinary, breeders
and others, will not accept the validity of the JRD DNA Test. I just
hope that the incidence of JRD in our GSD breed does not escalate to
a much higher level in the meantime. In some breeds JRD has reached
such high levels of incidence that most dogs tested are carriers,
and breeders are somewhat relieved when they test a dog and it is a
carrier, and not a homozygote carrier. I pray that JRD does not
reach such levels in the GSD breed.
I
look forward to when most GSD breeders can DNA test their dogs for
JRD. Of course there are other diseases that can affect GSD which
may be considered more serious than JRD; I sincerely hope DNA tests
are discovered for all of these. It is Biologists such as Doctor
Mary Whiteley who we need to do the painstaking and expensive
research in order to discover such DNA tests. I do not know of any
GSD breeder capable of doing such research, and I certainly do not
know of any GSD breeder capable of scientifically challenging such
research or DNA test discoveries. Until the JRD DNA Test is
scientifically published NO other scientist can have any knowledge
of the test, it is being patented around the world, and until
that is completed the scientific details of the JRD DNA test are
completely secret. So clearly no individual or organisation can make
any meaningful criticism of the test. To question the integrity
of a biologist like Doctor Mary Whiteley, in respect of her claims
regarding her discovery of a DNA test for JRD, after years of
dedicated scientific research, is both unacceptable and offensive.
To consider that she could have waited some two to three years after
her discovery, whilst all patenting and scientific publication is
complete, would have meant depriving those breeds with a very high
incidence of JRD from starting their fight to reduce and hopefully
eliminate JRD from their breeds.
I understand that the treating of kidney failure is one of the most
consistently discouraging aspects of veterinary medical practice.
The difficulty stems from the fact that once a dog has lost 75% of
total renal function, the ability to remove metabolic waste products
is outweighed by the build up of those toxins. The dog’s kidneys are
simply not able to keep up with the blood cleaning and as a result
gradually its blood becomes increasingly more toxic. Body chemistry
swings more and more acidic, important chemicals and nutrients are
lost from the body and the animal comes gradually closer and closer
to a fatal uremic poisoning. In some cases, gradual kidney tissue
loss can be present for years before the patient becomes critical
and actual "renal failure" is diagnosed.