Bateson has recommended the Kennel Club to upgrade its Accredited
Breeder Scheme PROMPTLY. If it is unable (or unwilling) to do so
another body should step forward to supply an appropriately robust
accredited breeder scheme.
The current Kennel Club Accredited Breeders Scheme
(ABS) is fundamentally flawed. It is impossible to police in a
satisfactory manner or even in an effective manner. The checks and
monitoring give the appearance of KC “window dressing”.
Window dressing
is something which runs through the Accredited Breeders Scheme like
the names of seaside resorts runs through sticks of rock. One only
has to consider the Accredited Breeders Scheme – ‘Health Screening’
aspects, it may surprise most people to learn that many of the
health screening aspects are only recommendations, in other words
entirely VOLUNTARY. This linked with the wholly inadequate policing
and checks on the scheme render it fundamentally flawed, and again
being a clear case of Kennel Club “window dressing”.
You
may now be having very serious doubts about the Kennel Club
Accredited Breeders Scheme, and there are even more major flaws
within it;
Even with the scheme requiring Hip Dysplasia screening, whatever the
hip score, high or low, they can still be bred from. INCREDIBLY
there is simply a requirement to ‘screen for hip dysplasia’ and
other diseases.
Also, can there be any real value to this ABS scheme when the clear
and unquestionable IDENTITY of each pedigree dog that is owned and
used for breeding by each and every accredited breeder, is NOT a “requirement”
of the scheme?
Micro-chipping and DNA parentage tests, to guarantee a
puppy’s accurate parentage, should be fundamental “requirements”
to ensure that any health screening and consequently any breeding is
in strict accordance with the required criteria.
Can
you imagine pedigrees indicating one thing and DNA parentage tests
illustrating something different, where would incest breeding be in
such a scenario. Without BOTH micro-chipping and DNA parentage tests
of breeding stock, MOST conditions of the Kennel Club Accredited
Breeders Scheme are based SOLELY on trust. Trust is something
that pedigree dog breeding can ill afford and TRUST is all too
frequently abused.
The
GSD fraternity here in the UK have for many years recognised the
need for tattoo/microchip identification, DNA tests, Hip & elbows
scores within acceptable limits, haemophilia test on all males, etc.
PLEASE REMEMBER THESE FACTS, because the Kennel Club refused to
accept proposals from the GSD partnership embracing these matters,
and then publicly attempted to imply the GSD community were not
co-operating with the Kennel Club on the Health and Welfare of the
GSD breed. Utterly disgraceful behaviour from the Kennel Club.
I
would hope the Kennel Club will fully grasp the recommendations of
the Bateson report, and NOT attempt to treat it like they have
treated the GSD Partnerships proposals! For instance I hope they
will grasp the following basic recommendations, PROMPTLY.
a.
All pre-mating tests for inherited disease
appropriate to the breed or breeds are undertaken on both
parents.
b.
No mating takes place if the tests indicate that it
would be inadvisable in the sense that it is likely to
produce welfare problems in the offspring and/or is
inadvisable in the context of a relevant breeding strategy
(see also 8.2).
c.
Every puppy identified by microchip prior to sale.
All
other Bateson recommendations can be seen in the pdf file above.
My
frustration with the Kennel Club stems from the flagrantly
disgraceful manner they have responded to the GSD community,
represented by the GSD partnership, over the last year or so.
The
GSD community put forward carefully considered proposals to
significantly improve the Health and Welfare of our GSD breed here
within the United Kingdom, through the use of the Kennel Club (KC)
registration system and through entry requirements into KC licensed
shows, they also included suggestions to improve the KC Accredited
Breeders Scheme with an “accredited GSD scheme” soundly based on our
breeds existing and well established GSD Breed Survey. Incidentally
our GSD Breed Survey includes compulsory health screening (with hip
score limits) and identification.
The
Kennel not only shilly shallied with our GSD representatives, by
cancelling meetings, and by refusing or failing to respond to most
major points, at one point attempting to draw them into the
fundamentally flawed KC Accredited Breeders Scheme, and being
displeased with the somewhat ‘pointed’ response they received; The
Kennel Club went on to completely ignore ALL the GSD partnership
proposals and have gone directly to GSD breed clubs with an
“undertaking” which is simply aimed at bringing the GSD
community into line with their “dictatorial” ways and their
“window dressing” style.
In
my firm opinion the Kennel Clubs policy on Health and Welfare of
pedigree dogs is substantially influenced by an attitude of “out
of site – out of mind”
If you have any doubts remaining, then please read the following
question to the Kennel Club, and their answer.
QUESTION SENT TO THE KENNEL CLUB
We are currently Exhibiting a GSD with a hip score of 3-47=50. We
would be very grateful if you could please clarify for us that if a
Judge is aware of our dogs hip score should they penalise him in the
show ring although he is very sound and displays excellent movement?
REPLY FROM THE KENNEL CLUB
In
answer to your query, judges are only required to consider whether a
dog is suffering from a visible condition which adversely
affects its health or welfare.
Therefore any knowledge which a Judge may have with regard to the
health status of the dog, such as its hip score, should not be taken
into account when judging, and it would not be appropriate to base
any judging decisions on such information.
authors note:
Contrary to current rumours, I have not been proposed and seconded
for membership of the Kennel Club, and this email should NOT be
construed in any way as an attempt by me to seek such a nomination.
David
Payne
:
+44 (0)1905 830900 -
email: